Commit 4aa73611 authored by Oleg Nesterov's avatar Oleg Nesterov Committed by Thomas Gleixner

posix-timers: don't switch to ->group_leader if ->it_process dies

posix_timer_event() drops SIGEV_THREAD_ID and switches to ->group_leader
if send_sigqueue() fails.

This is not very useful and doesn't work reliably.  send_sigqueue() can
only fail if ->it_process is dead.  But it can die before it dequeues the
SI_TIMER signal, in that case the timer stops anyway.

Remove this code.  I guess it was needed a long ago to ensure that the
timer is not destroyed when when its creator thread dies.

Q: perhaps it makes sense to change sys_timer_settime() to return an error
if ->it_process is dead?
Signed-off-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
parent bb34d92f
......@@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ void do_schedule_next_timer(struct siginfo *info)
int posix_timer_event(struct k_itimer *timr, int si_private)
{
int shared, ret;
/*
* FIXME: if ->sigq is queued we can race with
* dequeue_signal()->do_schedule_next_timer().
......@@ -316,20 +317,10 @@ int posix_timer_event(struct k_itimer *timr, int si_private)
timr->sigq->info.si_tid = timr->it_id;
timr->sigq->info.si_value = timr->it_sigev_value;
if (timr->it_sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID) {
struct task_struct *leader;
int ret = send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_process, 0);
if (likely(ret >= 0))
return ret;
timr->it_sigev_notify = SIGEV_SIGNAL;
leader = timr->it_process->group_leader;
put_task_struct(timr->it_process);
timr->it_process = leader;
}
return send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_process, 1);
shared = !(timr->it_sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID);
ret = send_sigqueue(timr->sigq, timr->it_process, shared);
/* If we failed to send the signal the timer stops. */
return ret > 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(posix_timer_event);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment