ceph: handle the case where a dentry has been renamed on outstanding req
It's possible for us to issue a lookup to revalidate a dentry concurrently with a rename. If done in the right order, then we could end up processing dentry info in the reply that no longer reflects the state of the dentry. If req->r_dentry->d_name differs from the one in the trace, then just ignore the trace in the reply. We only need to do this however if the parent's i_rwsem is not held. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment