Commit 4e0d105c authored by Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)'s avatar Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

sched: Use CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES instead of MAX_RT_PRIO in cpupri check

commit 6227cb00 upstream.

The check at the beginning of cpupri_find() makes sure that the task_pri
variable does not exceed the cp->pri_to_cpu array length. But that length
is CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES not MAX_RT_PRIO, where it will miss the last two
priorities in that array.

As task_pri is computed from convert_prio() which should never be bigger
than CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES, if the check should cause a panic if it is
hit.
Reported-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1397015410.5212.13.camel@marge.simpson.netSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 22feaed1
......@@ -68,8 +68,7 @@ int cpupri_find(struct cpupri *cp, struct task_struct *p,
int idx = 0;
int task_pri = convert_prio(p->prio);
if (task_pri >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
return 0;
BUG_ON(task_pri >= CPUPRI_NR_PRIORITIES);
for (idx = 0; idx < task_pri; idx++) {
struct cpupri_vec *vec = &cp->pri_to_cpu[idx];
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment