Commit 4e2a354e authored by Oliver Barta's avatar Oliver Barta Committed by Mark Brown

regulator: core: fix false positive in regulator_late_cleanup()

The check done by regulator_late_cleanup() to detect whether a regulator
is on was inconsistent with the check done by _regulator_is_enabled().
While _regulator_is_enabled() takes the enable GPIO into account,
regulator_late_cleanup() was not doing that.

This resulted in a false positive, e.g. when a GPIO-controlled fixed
regulator was used, which was not enabled at boot time, e.g.

reg_disp_1v2: reg_disp_1v2 {
	compatible = "regulator-fixed";
	regulator-name = "display_1v2";
	regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>;
	regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>;
	gpio = <&tlmm 148 0>;
	enable-active-high;
};

Such regulator doesn't have an is_enabled() operation. Nevertheless
it's state can be determined based on the enable GPIO. The check in
regulator_late_cleanup() wrongly assumed that the regulator is on and
tried to disable it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Barta <oliver.barta@aptiv.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220208084645.8686-1-oliver.barta@aptiv.comSigned-off-by: default avatarMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
parent b4c18c18
......@@ -6014,9 +6014,8 @@ core_initcall(regulator_init);
static int regulator_late_cleanup(struct device *dev, void *data)
{
struct regulator_dev *rdev = dev_to_rdev(dev);
const struct regulator_ops *ops = rdev->desc->ops;
struct regulation_constraints *c = rdev->constraints;
int enabled, ret;
int ret;
if (c && c->always_on)
return 0;
......@@ -6029,14 +6028,8 @@ static int regulator_late_cleanup(struct device *dev, void *data)
if (rdev->use_count)
goto unlock;
/* If we can't read the status assume it's always on. */
if (ops->is_enabled)
enabled = ops->is_enabled(rdev);
else
enabled = 1;
/* But if reading the status failed, assume that it's off. */
if (enabled <= 0)
/* If reading the status failed, assume that it's off. */
if (_regulator_is_enabled(rdev) <= 0)
goto unlock;
if (have_full_constraints()) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment