Commit 50895825 authored by Frederic Weisbecker's avatar Frederic Weisbecker Committed by Paul E. McKenney

rcu: Explain why rcu_all_qs() is a stub in preemptible TREE RCU

The cond_resched() function reports an RCU quiescent state only in
non-preemptible TREE RCU implementation.  This commit therefore adds a
comment explaining why cond_resched() does nothing in preemptible kernels.
Signed-off-by: default avatarFrederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
parent 8211e922
......@@ -7781,6 +7781,17 @@ int __sched __cond_resched(void)
preempt_schedule_common();
return 1;
}
/*
* In preemptible kernels, ->rcu_read_lock_nesting tells the tick
* whether the current CPU is in an RCU read-side critical section,
* so the tick can report quiescent states even for CPUs looping
* in kernel context. In contrast, in non-preemptible kernels,
* RCU readers leave no in-memory hints, which means that CPU-bound
* processes executing in kernel context might never report an
* RCU quiescent state. Therefore, the following code causes
* cond_resched() to report a quiescent state, but only when RCU
* is in urgent need of one.
*/
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
rcu_all_qs();
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment