acpi,mm: fix typo sibiling -> sibling

First found this typo as reviewing memory tier code. Fix it by sed like:
$ sed -i 's/sibiling/sibling/g' $(git grep -l sibiling)

so the acpi one will be corrected as well.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230802092856.819328-1-lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.comSigned-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Huang, Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>

drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c

@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static void round_robin_cpu(unsigned int tsk_index)
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, pad_busy_cpus)
 		cpumask_or(tmp, tmp, topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu));
 	cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, tmp);
-	/* avoid HT sibilings if possible */
+	/* avoid HT siblings if possible */
 	if (cpumask_empty(tmp))
 		cpumask_andnot(tmp, cpu_online_mask, pad_busy_cpus);
 	if (cpumask_empty(tmp)) {

include/linux/memory-tiers.h

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
 struct memory_tier;
 struct memory_dev_type {
 	/* list of memory types that are part of same tier as this type */
-	struct list_head tier_sibiling;
+	struct list_head tier_sibling;
 	/* abstract distance for this specific memory type */
 	int adistance;
 	/* Nodes of same abstract distance */

mm/memory-tiers.c

@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static __always_inline nodemask_t get_memtier_nodemask(struct memory_tier *memti
 	nodemask_t nodes = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 	struct memory_dev_type *memtype;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibiling)
+	list_for_each_entry(memtype, &memtier->memory_types, tier_sibling)
 		nodes_or(nodes, nodes, memtype->nodes);
 
 	return nodes;
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
 	 * If the memtype is already part of a memory tier,
 	 * just return that.
 	 */
-	if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibiling)) {
+	if (!list_empty(&memtype->tier_sibling)) {
 		list_for_each_entry(memtier, &memory_tiers, list) {
 			if (adistance == memtier->adistance_start)
 				return memtier;
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static struct memory_tier *find_create_memory_tier(struct memory_dev_type *memty
 	memtier = new_memtier;
 
 link_memtype:
-	list_add(&memtype->tier_sibiling, &memtier->memory_types);
+	list_add(&memtype->tier_sibling, &memtier->memory_types);
 	return memtier;
 }
 
@@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static bool clear_node_memory_tier(int node)
 		memtype = node_memory_types[node].memtype;
 		node_clear(node, memtype->nodes);
 		if (nodes_empty(memtype->nodes)) {
-			list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
+			list_del_init(&memtype->tier_sibling);
 			if (list_empty(&memtier->memory_types))
 				destroy_memory_tier(memtier);
 		}
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ struct memory_dev_type *alloc_memory_type(int adistance)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
 	memtype->adistance = adistance;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibiling);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&memtype->tier_sibling);
 	memtype->nodes  = NODE_MASK_NONE;
 	kref_init(&memtype->kref);
 	return memtype;