sched/fair: Modify the comment about lock assumptions in migrate_task_rq_fair()

The comment describing migrate_task_rq_fair() says that the caller
should hold p->pi_lock. But in some cases the caller can hold
task_rq(p)->lock instead of p->pi_lock. So the comment is broken and
this patch fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1447806899-20303-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

kernel/sched/fair.c

@@ -5058,8 +5058,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int sd_flag, int wake_f
 /*
  * Called immediately before a task is migrated to a new cpu; task_cpu(p) and
  * cfs_rq_of(p) references at time of call are still valid and identify the
- * previous cpu.  However, the caller only guarantees p->pi_lock is held; no
- * other assumptions, including the state of rq->lock, should be made.
+ * previous cpu. The caller guarantees p->pi_lock or task_rq(p)->lock is held.
  */
 static void migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p)
 {