Commit 53a42286 authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva Committed by David S. Miller

qed: qed_dev: Mark expected switch fall-throughs

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
where we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the code comments with
a proper "fall through" annotation, which is what GCC is expecting
to find.

Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114809 ("Missing break in switch")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114810 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent e77f02b8
......@@ -1789,14 +1789,14 @@ int qed_hw_init(struct qed_dev *cdev, struct qed_hw_init_params *p_params)
p_hwfn->hw_info.hw_mode);
if (rc)
break;
/* Fall into */
/* Fall through */
case FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_PORT:
rc = qed_hw_init_port(p_hwfn, p_hwfn->p_main_ptt,
p_hwfn->hw_info.hw_mode);
if (rc)
break;
/* Fall into */
/* Fall through */
case FW_MSG_CODE_DRV_LOAD_FUNCTION:
rc = qed_hw_init_pf(p_hwfn, p_hwfn->p_main_ptt,
p_params->p_tunn,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment