Commit 54823af9 authored by Georgi Djakov's avatar Georgi Djakov Committed by Stephen Boyd

clk: qcom: Always add factor clock for xo clocks

Currently the RPM/RPM-SMD clock drivers do not register the xo clocks,
so we should always add factor clock. When we later add xo clocks support
into the drivers, we should update this function to skip registration.
By doing so we avoid any DT dependencies.
Signed-off-by: default avatarGeorgi Djakov <georgi.djakov@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
parent 1001354c
...@@ -153,15 +153,12 @@ int qcom_cc_register_board_clk(struct device *dev, const char *path, ...@@ -153,15 +153,12 @@ int qcom_cc_register_board_clk(struct device *dev, const char *path,
const char *name, unsigned long rate) const char *name, unsigned long rate)
{ {
bool add_factor = true; bool add_factor = true;
struct device_node *node;
/*
/* The RPM clock driver will add the factor clock if present */ * TODO: The RPM clock driver currently does not support the xo clock.
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_QCOM_RPMCC)) { * When xo is added to the RPM clock driver, we should change this
node = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "qcom,rpmcc"); * function to skip registration of xo factor clocks.
if (of_device_is_available(node)) */
add_factor = false;
of_node_put(node);
}
return _qcom_cc_register_board_clk(dev, path, name, rate, add_factor); return _qcom_cc_register_board_clk(dev, path, name, rate, add_factor);
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment