Commit 565ce72e authored by Matthew Auld's avatar Matthew Auld Committed by Rodrigo Vivi

drm/xe: don't allocate under ct->lock

Seems to be a sensitive lock, where ct->lock looks to be primed with
fs_reclaim, so holding that and then allocating memory will cause
lockdep to complain. We need to change the ordering wrt to grabbing the
ct->lock and potentially grabbing the runtime_pm, since some of the
runtime_pm routines can allocate memory (or at least that's what lockdep
seems to suggest).
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
parent a2f9f4ff
...@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ ...@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include "xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h" #include "xe_gt_tlb_invalidation.h"
#include "xe_device.h"
#include "xe_gt.h" #include "xe_gt.h"
#include "xe_guc.h" #include "xe_guc.h"
#include "xe_guc_ct.h" #include "xe_guc_ct.h"
...@@ -112,6 +113,8 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc, ...@@ -112,6 +113,8 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
* in order which they currently are, if that changes the algorithm will * in order which they currently are, if that changes the algorithm will
* need to be updated. * need to be updated.
*/ */
xe_device_mem_access_get(gt->xe);
mutex_lock(&guc->ct.lock); mutex_lock(&guc->ct.lock);
seqno = gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno; seqno = gt->tlb_invalidation.seqno;
if (fence) { if (fence) {
...@@ -140,6 +143,7 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc, ...@@ -140,6 +143,7 @@ static int send_tlb_invalidation(struct xe_guc *guc,
if (ret < 0 && fence) if (ret < 0 && fence)
invalidation_fence_signal(fence); invalidation_fence_signal(fence);
mutex_unlock(&guc->ct.lock); mutex_unlock(&guc->ct.lock);
xe_device_mem_access_put(gt->xe);
return ret; return ret;
} }
......
...@@ -498,26 +498,22 @@ static int __guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, ...@@ -498,26 +498,22 @@ static int __guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action,
} }
} }
xe_device_mem_access_get(ct_to_xe(ct));
retry: retry:
ret = has_room(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN, g2h_len); ret = has_room(ct, len + GUC_CTB_HDR_LEN, g2h_len);
if (unlikely(ret)) if (unlikely(ret))
goto put_wa; goto out;
ret = h2g_write(ct, action, len, g2h_fence ? g2h_fence->seqno : 0, ret = h2g_write(ct, action, len, g2h_fence ? g2h_fence->seqno : 0,
!!g2h_fence); !!g2h_fence);
if (unlikely(ret)) { if (unlikely(ret)) {
if (ret == -EAGAIN) if (ret == -EAGAIN)
goto retry; goto retry;
goto put_wa; goto out;
} }
g2h_reserve_space(ct, g2h_len, num_g2h); g2h_reserve_space(ct, g2h_len, num_g2h);
xe_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct)); xe_guc_notify(ct_to_guc(ct));
put_wa:
xe_device_mem_access_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
out: out:
return ret; return ret;
} }
...@@ -539,6 +535,7 @@ static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len, ...@@ -539,6 +535,7 @@ static int guc_ct_send_locked(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
XE_BUG_ON(g2h_len && g2h_fence); XE_BUG_ON(g2h_len && g2h_fence);
lockdep_assert_held(&ct->lock); lockdep_assert_held(&ct->lock);
xe_device_assert_mem_access(ct_to_xe(ct));
try_again: try_again:
ret = __guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h, ret = __guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h,
...@@ -608,10 +605,14 @@ static int guc_ct_send(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len, ...@@ -608,10 +605,14 @@ static int guc_ct_send(struct xe_guc_ct *ct, const u32 *action, u32 len,
XE_BUG_ON(g2h_len && g2h_fence); XE_BUG_ON(g2h_len && g2h_fence);
xe_device_mem_access_get(ct_to_xe(ct));
mutex_lock(&ct->lock); mutex_lock(&ct->lock);
ret = guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h, g2h_fence); ret = guc_ct_send_locked(ct, action, len, g2h_len, num_g2h, g2h_fence);
mutex_unlock(&ct->lock); mutex_unlock(&ct->lock);
xe_device_mem_access_put(ct_to_xe(ct));
return ret; return ret;
} }
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment