Commit 57ecc93c authored by Daniel Vetter's avatar Daniel Vetter Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

drm/i915: correctly order the ring init sequence

commit 0d8957c8 upstream.

We may only start to set up the new register values after having
confirmed that the ring is truely off. Otherwise the hw might lose the
newly written register values. This is caught later on in the init
sequence, when we check whether the register writes have stuck.
Reviewed-by: default avatarJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50522Tested-by: default avatarYang Guang <guang.a.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent 1a475b7a
......@@ -258,8 +258,6 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
I915_WRITE_HEAD(ring, 0);
ring->write_tail(ring, 0);
/* Initialize the ring. */
I915_WRITE_START(ring, obj->gtt_offset);
head = I915_READ_HEAD(ring) & HEAD_ADDR;
/* G45 ring initialization fails to reset head to zero */
......@@ -285,6 +283,11 @@ static int init_ring_common(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring)
}
}
/* Initialize the ring. This must happen _after_ we've cleared the ring
* registers with the above sequence (the readback of the HEAD registers
* also enforces ordering), otherwise the hw might lose the new ring
* register values. */
I915_WRITE_START(ring, obj->gtt_offset);
I915_WRITE_CTL(ring,
((ring->size - PAGE_SIZE) & RING_NR_PAGES)
| RING_VALID);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment