loop: fix concurrent lo_open/lo_release

CVE-2018-5344

范龙飞 reports that KASAN can report a use-after-free in __lock_acquire.
The reason is due to insufficient serialization in lo_release(), which
will continue to use the loop device even after it has decremented the
lo_refcnt to zero.

In the meantime, another process can come in, open the loop device
again as it is being shut down. Confusion ensues.
Reported-by: 范龙飞 <long7573@126.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
(cherry picked from commit ae665016)
Signed-off-by: Kleber Sacilotto de Souza <kleber.souza@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>

drivers/block/loop.c

@@ -1624,9 +1624,8 @@ static int lo_open(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
+static void __lo_release(struct loop_device *lo)
 {
-	struct loop_device *lo = disk->private_data;
 	int err;
 
 	if (atomic_dec_return(&lo->lo_refcnt))
@@ -1652,6 +1651,13 @@ static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
 	mutex_unlock(&lo->lo_ctl_mutex);
 }
 
+static void lo_release(struct gendisk *disk, fmode_t mode)
+{
+	mutex_lock(&loop_index_mutex);
+	__lo_release(disk->private_data);
+	mutex_unlock(&loop_index_mutex);
+}
+
 static const struct block_device_operations lo_fops = {
 	.owner =	THIS_MODULE,
 	.open =		lo_open,