Commit 595a9f9a authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann

ARM: omap1/ams-delta: warn about failed regulator enable

The modem pm handler in the ams-delta board uses regulator_enable()
but does not check for a successful return code:

board-ams-delta.c:521:3: error: ignoring return value of 'regulator_enable', declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Werror=unused-result]

It is not easy to propagate that return code to the callers in
uart_configure_port/uart_suspend_port/uart_resume_port, unless
we change all UART drivers, and it is unclear what those would
do with the return code.

Instead, this patch uses a runtime warning to replace the
compiletime warning. I have checked that the regulator in question
is hardcoded to a fixed-voltage GPIO regulator, and that should
never fail to get enabled if I understand the code right.
Acked-by: default avatarTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: default avatarAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
Link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8391981/Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
parent 47589c4a
......@@ -510,6 +510,7 @@ static void __init ams_delta_init(void)
static void modem_pm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state, unsigned old)
{
struct modem_private_data *priv = port->private_data;
int ret;
if (IS_ERR(priv->regulator))
return;
......@@ -518,9 +519,16 @@ static void modem_pm(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int state, unsigned old)
return;
if (state == 0)
regulator_enable(priv->regulator);
ret = regulator_enable(priv->regulator);
else if (old == 0)
regulator_disable(priv->regulator);
ret = regulator_disable(priv->regulator);
else
ret = 0;
if (ret)
dev_warn(port->dev,
"ams_delta modem_pm: failed to %sable regulator: %d\n",
state ? "dis" : "en", ret);
}
static struct plat_serial8250_port ams_delta_modem_ports[] = {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment