btrfs: index free space entries on size
Currently we index free space on offset only, because usually we have a hint from the allocator that we want to honor for locality reasons. However if we fail to use this hint we have to go back to a brute force search through the free space entries to find a large enough extent. With sufficiently fragmented free space this becomes quite expensive, as we have to linearly search all of the free space entries to find if we have a part that's long enough. To fix this add a cached rb tree to index based on free space entry bytes. This will allow us to quickly look up the largest chunk in the free space tree for this block group, and stop searching once we've found an entry that is too small to satisfy our allocation. We simply choose to use this tree if we're searching from the beginning of the block group, as we know we do not care about locality at that point. I wrote an allocator test that creates a 10TiB ram backed null block device and then fallocates random files until the file system is full. I think go through and delete all of the odd files. Then I spawn 8 threads that fallocate 64MiB files (1/2 our extent size cap) until the file system is full again. I use bcc's funclatency to measure the latency of find_free_extent. The baseline results are nsecs : count distribution 0 -> 1 : 0 | | 2 -> 3 : 0 | | 4 -> 7 : 0 | | 8 -> 15 : 0 | | 16 -> 31 : 0 | | 32 -> 63 : 0 | | 64 -> 127 : 0 | | 128 -> 255 : 0 | | 256 -> 511 : 10356 |**** | 512 -> 1023 : 58242 |************************* | 1024 -> 2047 : 74418 |******************************** | 2048 -> 4095 : 90393 |****************************************| 4096 -> 8191 : 79119 |*********************************** | 8192 -> 16383 : 35614 |*************** | 16384 -> 32767 : 13418 |***** | 32768 -> 65535 : 12811 |***** | 65536 -> 131071 : 17090 |******* | 131072 -> 262143 : 26465 |*********** | 262144 -> 524287 : 40179 |***************** | 524288 -> 1048575 : 55469 |************************ | 1048576 -> 2097151 : 48807 |********************* | 2097152 -> 4194303 : 26744 |*********** | 4194304 -> 8388607 : 35351 |*************** | 8388608 -> 16777215 : 13918 |****** | 16777216 -> 33554431 : 21 | | avg = 908079 nsecs, total: 580889071441 nsecs, count: 639690 And the patch results are nsecs : count distribution 0 -> 1 : 0 | | 2 -> 3 : 0 | | 4 -> 7 : 0 | | 8 -> 15 : 0 | | 16 -> 31 : 0 | | 32 -> 63 : 0 | | 64 -> 127 : 0 | | 128 -> 255 : 0 | | 256 -> 511 : 6883 |** | 512 -> 1023 : 54346 |********************* | 1024 -> 2047 : 79170 |******************************** | 2048 -> 4095 : 98890 |****************************************| 4096 -> 8191 : 81911 |********************************* | 8192 -> 16383 : 27075 |********** | 16384 -> 32767 : 14668 |***** | 32768 -> 65535 : 13251 |***** | 65536 -> 131071 : 15340 |****** | 131072 -> 262143 : 26715 |********** | 262144 -> 524287 : 43274 |***************** | 524288 -> 1048575 : 53870 |********************* | 1048576 -> 2097151 : 55368 |********************** | 2097152 -> 4194303 : 41036 |**************** | 4194304 -> 8388607 : 24927 |********** | 8388608 -> 16777215 : 33 | | 16777216 -> 33554431 : 9 | | avg = 623599 nsecs, total: 397259314759 nsecs, count: 637042 There's a little variation in the amount of calls done because of timing of the threads with metadata requirements, but the avg, total, and count's are relatively consistent between runs (usually within 2-5% of each other). As you can see here we have around a 30% decrease in average latency with a 30% decrease in overall time spent in find_free_extent. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment