drm/i915: Unify VBT version number comments

Use a more standard form for the VT version number comments.

One slight oddball case is the dp_max_link_rate that had two
version numbers (216/230) and a platform name (GLK). The
story goes that the field was introduced in the spec in
version 216, along with a note that it's used on CNL+. Later
in version 230 the definition of the bit was changed in
bacakwards incompatible ways and the CNL note disappeard.
For us the original CNL+ note in the header got changed to
to GLK+ when all CNL support was dropped from the codebase.
We do still need (and have) handling for both the 216+ and
the 230+ defintions (parse_bdb_216_dp_max_link_rate() vs.
parse_bdb_230_dp_max_link_rate()).
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220715202044.11153-2-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>