Commit 5d73bea2 authored by Bart Van Assche's avatar Bart Van Assche Committed by Robert Love

libfc: Protect ep->esb_stat changes via ex_lock

This patch avoids that the WARN_ON(!(ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_SEQ_INIT))
statement in fc_seq_send_locked() gets triggered sporadically when
running FCoE target code due to concurrent ep->esb_stat modifications.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRobert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
parent b8678865
......@@ -988,6 +988,7 @@ static enum fc_pf_rjt_reason fc_seq_lookup_recip(struct fc_lport *lport,
}
}
spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
/*
* At this point, we have the exchange held.
* Find or create the sequence.
......@@ -1015,11 +1016,11 @@ static enum fc_pf_rjt_reason fc_seq_lookup_recip(struct fc_lport *lport,
* sending RSP, hence write request on other
* end never finishes.
*/
spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
sp->ssb_stat |= SSB_ST_RESP;
sp->id = fh->fh_seq_id;
spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
} else {
spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
/* sequence/exch should exist */
reject = FC_RJT_SEQ_ID;
goto rel;
......@@ -1030,6 +1031,7 @@ static enum fc_pf_rjt_reason fc_seq_lookup_recip(struct fc_lport *lport,
if (f_ctl & FC_FC_SEQ_INIT)
ep->esb_stat |= ESB_ST_SEQ_INIT;
spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
fr_seq(fp) = sp;
out:
......@@ -1479,8 +1481,11 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_seq_resp(struct fc_exch_mgr *mp, struct fc_frame *fp)
f_ctl = ntoh24(fh->fh_f_ctl);
fr_seq(fp) = sp;
spin_lock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
if (f_ctl & FC_FC_SEQ_INIT)
ep->esb_stat |= ESB_ST_SEQ_INIT;
spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
if (fc_sof_needs_ack(sof))
fc_seq_send_ack(sp, fp);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment