Commit 5d8dbb7f authored by Pavel Skripkin's avatar Pavel Skripkin Committed by Steffen Klassert

net: xfrm: fix shift-out-of-bounce

We need to check up->dirmask to avoid shift-out-of-bounce bug,
since up->dirmask comes from userspace.

Also, added XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX constant to uapi to inform
user-space that up->dirmask has maximum possible value

Fixes: 2d151d39 ("xfrm: Add possibility to set the default to block if we have no policy")
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+9cd5837a045bbee5b810@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: default avatarPavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
parent 2d151d39
......@@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ struct xfrm_user_offload {
#define XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND 2
struct xfrm_userpolicy_default {
#define XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX (sizeof(__u8) * 8)
__u8 dirmask;
__u8 action;
};
......
......@@ -1966,9 +1966,14 @@ static int xfrm_set_default(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
{
struct net *net = sock_net(skb->sk);
struct xfrm_userpolicy_default *up = nlmsg_data(nlh);
u8 dirmask = (1 << up->dirmask) & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_MASK;
u8 dirmask;
u8 old_default = net->xfrm.policy_default;
if (up->dirmask >= XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
dirmask = (1 << up->dirmask) & XFRM_POL_DEFAULT_MASK;
net->xfrm.policy_default = (old_default & (0xff ^ dirmask))
| (up->action << up->dirmask);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment