Commit 5de72a22 authored by Christian Borntraeger's avatar Christian Borntraeger

s390/kvm: REPLACE barrier fixup with READ_ONCE

ACCESS_ONCE does not work reliably on non-scalar types. For
example gcc 4.6 and 4.7 might remove the volatile tag for such
accesses during the SRA (scalar replacement of aggregates) step
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58145)

Commit 1365039d ("KVM: s390: Fix ipte locking") replace
ACCESS_ONCE with barriers. Lets use READ_ONCE instead.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
parent 488beef1
......@@ -229,12 +229,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
old = *ic;
barrier();
old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
while (old.k) {
cond_resched();
old = *ic;
barrier();
old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
}
new = old;
new.k = 1;
......@@ -253,8 +251,7 @@ static void ipte_unlock_simple(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
goto out;
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
old = *ic;
barrier();
old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
new = old;
new.k = 0;
} while (cmpxchg(&ic->val, old.val, new.val) != old.val);
......@@ -269,12 +266,10 @@ static void ipte_lock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
old = *ic;
barrier();
old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
while (old.kg) {
cond_resched();
old = *ic;
barrier();
old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
}
new = old;
new.k = 1;
......@@ -288,8 +283,7 @@ static void ipte_unlock_siif(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
ic = &vcpu->kvm->arch.sca->ipte_control;
do {
old = *ic;
barrier();
old = READ_ONCE(*ic);
new = old;
new.kh--;
if (!new.kh)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment