ASoC: soc-pcm: add dpcm_runtime_setup_fe()
dpcm_fe_dai_startup() (= A) calls dpcm_set_fe_runtime() (= B) to setup DPCM runtime. From *naming point of view*, it sounds like setup function for FE. (A) static int dpcm_fe_dai_startup(...) { ... (B) dpcm_set_fe_runtime(...); ... } But in dpcm_set_fe_runtime() (= B), It setups FE by for_each loop (= X), and setups BE by dpcm_runtime_merge_xxx() (= Y). (B) static void dpcm_set_fe_runtime(...) { ... ^ for_each_rtd_cpu_dais(...) { | ... (X) soc_pcm_hw_update_rate(...); | soc_pcm_hw_update_chan(...); | soc_pcm_hw_update_format(...); v } ^ dpcm_runtime_merge_format(...); (Y) dpcm_runtime_merge_chan(...); v dpcm_runtime_merge_rate(...); } These means that the function which is called as xxx_fe_xxx() is setups both FE and BE. This is confusable and can be hot bed for bug. To tidyup it, as 1st step, this patch adds new dpcm_runtime_setup_fe() for (X). Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87pn0tvsgx.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.comSigned-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment