mm: swap: separate SSD allocation from scan_swap_map_slots()
Previously the SSD and HDD share the same swap_map scan loop in scan_swap_map_slots(). This function is complex and hard to flow the execution flow. scan_swap_map_try_ssd_cluster() can already do most of the heavy lifting to locate the candidate swap range in the cluster. However it needs to go back to scan_swap_map_slots() to check conflict and then perform the allocation. When scan_swap_map_try_ssd_cluster() failed, it still depended on the scan_swap_map_slots() to do brute force scanning of the swap_map. When the swapfile is large and almost full, it will take some CPU time to go through the swap_map array. Get rid of the cluster allocation dependency on the swap_map scan loop in scan_swap_map_slots(). Streamline the cluster allocation code path. No more conflict checks. For order 0 swap entry, when run out of free and nonfull list. It will allocate from the higher order nonfull cluster list. Users should see less CPU time spent on searching the free swap slot when swapfile is almost full. [ryncsn@gmail.com: fix array-bounds error with CONFIG_THP_SWAP=n] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAMgjq7Bz0DY+rY0XgCoH7-Q=uHLdo3omi8kUr4ePDweNyofsbQ@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240730-swap-allocator-v5-3-cb9c148b9297@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Reported-by:
Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment