Commit 5fd55fb3 authored by Sai Gurrappadi's avatar Sai Gurrappadi Committed by Jiri Slaby

cpufreq: Fix GOV_LIMITS handling for the userspace governor

commit e43e94c1 upstream.

Currently, the userspace governor only updates frequency on GOV_LIMITS
if policy->cur falls outside policy->{min/max}. However, it is also
necessary to update current frequency on GOV_LIMITS to match the user
requested value if it can be achieved within the new policy->{max/min}.

This was previously the behaviour in the governor until commit d1922f02
("cpufreq: Simplify userspace governor") which incorrectly assumed that
policy->cur == user requested frequency via scaling_setspeed. This won't
be true if the user requested frequency falls outside policy->{min/max}.
Ex: a temporary thermal cap throttled the user requested frequency.

Fix this by storing the user requested frequency in a seperate variable.
The governor will then try to achieve this request on every GOV_LIMITS
change.

Fixes: d1922f02 (cpufreq: Simplify userspace governor)
Signed-off-by: default avatarSai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
parent b0c04f74
......@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, cpu_is_managed);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(userspace_mutex);
......@@ -31,6 +32,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(userspace_mutex);
static int cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
{
int ret = -EINVAL;
unsigned int *setspeed = policy->governor_data;
pr_debug("cpufreq_set for cpu %u, freq %u kHz\n", policy->cpu, freq);
......@@ -38,6 +40,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int freq)
if (!per_cpu(cpu_is_managed, policy->cpu))
goto err;
*setspeed = freq;
/*
* We're safe from concurrent calls to ->target() here
* as we hold the userspace_mutex lock. If we were calling
......@@ -60,19 +64,45 @@ static ssize_t show_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, char *buf)
return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", policy->cur);
}
static int cpufreq_userspace_policy_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
unsigned int *setspeed;
setspeed = kzalloc(sizeof(*setspeed), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!setspeed)
return -ENOMEM;
policy->governor_data = setspeed;
return 0;
}
static int cpufreq_governor_userspace(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int event)
{
unsigned int *setspeed = policy->governor_data;
unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
int rc = 0;
if (event == CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT)
return cpufreq_userspace_policy_init(policy);
if (!setspeed)
return -EINVAL;
switch (event) {
case CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT:
mutex_lock(&userspace_mutex);
policy->governor_data = NULL;
kfree(setspeed);
mutex_unlock(&userspace_mutex);
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_START:
BUG_ON(!policy->cur);
pr_debug("started managing cpu %u\n", cpu);
mutex_lock(&userspace_mutex);
per_cpu(cpu_is_managed, cpu) = 1;
*setspeed = policy->cur;
mutex_unlock(&userspace_mutex);
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP:
......@@ -80,20 +110,23 @@ static int cpufreq_governor_userspace(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
mutex_lock(&userspace_mutex);
per_cpu(cpu_is_managed, cpu) = 0;
*setspeed = 0;
mutex_unlock(&userspace_mutex);
break;
case CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS:
mutex_lock(&userspace_mutex);
pr_debug("limit event for cpu %u: %u - %u kHz, currently %u kHz\n",
cpu, policy->min, policy->max,
policy->cur);
pr_debug("limit event for cpu %u: %u - %u kHz, currently %u kHz, last set to %u kHz\n",
cpu, policy->min, policy->max, policy->cur, *setspeed);
if (policy->max < policy->cur)
if (policy->max < *setspeed)
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->max,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
else if (policy->min > policy->cur)
else if (policy->min > *setspeed)
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, policy->min,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
else
__cpufreq_driver_target(policy, *setspeed,
CPUFREQ_RELATION_L);
mutex_unlock(&userspace_mutex);
break;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment