Commit 60c59751 authored by Matt Fleming's avatar Matt Fleming Committed by Al Viro

microblaze: use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block is
pending in the shared queue.

Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate code
across architectures.  In the past some architectures got this code wrong,
so using this helper function should stop that from happening again.
Acked-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarMichal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent bcb8c8d0
......@@ -105,10 +105,7 @@ asmlinkage long sys_rt_sigreturn(struct pt_regs *regs)
goto badframe;
sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
current->blocked = set;
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
set_current_blocked(&set);
if (restore_sigcontext(regs, &frame->uc.uc_mcontext, &rval))
goto badframe;
......@@ -326,12 +323,7 @@ handle_signal(unsigned long sig, struct k_sigaction *ka,
if (ret)
return ret;
spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked, &ka->sa.sa_mask);
if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
block_sigmask(ka, sig);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment