Commit 63c43b0e authored by Boaz Harrosh's avatar Boaz Harrosh Committed by James Bottomley

[SCSI] scsi_lib: Fix bug in completion of bidi commands

Because of the terrible structuring of scsi-bidi-commands
it breaks some of the life time rules of a scsi-command.
It is now not allowed to free up the block-request before
cleanup and partial deallocation of the scsi-command. (Which
is not so for none bidi commands)

The right fix to this problem would be to make bidi command
a first citizen by allocating a scsi_sdb pointer at scsi command
just like cmd->prot_sdb. The bidi sdb should be allocated/deallocated
as part of the get/put_command (Again like the prot_sdb) and the
current decoupling of scsi_cmnd and blk-request should be kept.

For now make sure scsi_release_buffers() is called before the
call to blk_end_request_all() which might cause the suicide of
the block requests. At best the leak of bidi buffers, at worse
a crash, as there is a race between the existence of the bidi_request
and the free of the associated bidi_sdb.

The reason this was never hit before is because only OSD has the potential
of doing asynchronous bidi commands. (So does bsg but it is never used)
And OSD clients just happen to do all their bidi commands synchronously, up
until recently.

CC: Stable Tree <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@suse.de>
parent f1053a7c
......@@ -749,9 +749,9 @@ void scsi_io_completion(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd, unsigned int good_bytes)
*/
req->next_rq->resid_len = scsi_in(cmd)->resid;
scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
blk_end_request_all(req, 0);
scsi_release_buffers(cmd);
scsi_next_command(cmd);
return;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment