Commit 643acea6 authored by Brian Norris's avatar Brian Norris Committed by Kalle Valo

mwifiex: re-register wiphy across reset

In general, it's helpful to use the same code for device removal as for
device reset, as this tends to have fewer bugs. Let's move the wiphy
unregistration code into the common reset and removal code.

In particular, it's very hard to properly handle the reset sequence when
something fails. Currently, if mwifiex_reinit_sw() fails, we've failed
to unregister the associated wiphy, and so running something as simple
as "iw phy" can trigger an OOPS, as the wiphy still has hooks back into
freed mwifiex data structures. For example, KASAN complained:

[... see reset fail for other reasons ...]
[ 1184.821158] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: dnld wifi firmware from 174948 bytes
[ 1186.870914] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: FW download over, size 608396 bytes
[ 1187.685990] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: WLAN FW is active
[ 1187.692673] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: cmd_wait_q terminated: -512
[ 1187.699075] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: info: _mwifiex_fw_dpc: unregister device
[ 1187.713476] mwifiex: Failed to bring up adapter: -5
[ 1187.718644] mwifiex_pcie 0000:01:00.0: reinit failed: -5

[... run `iw phy` ...]
[ 1212.902419] ==================================================================
[ 1212.909806] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in mwifiex_cfg80211_get_antenna+0x54/0xfc [mwifiex] at addr ffffffc0ad1a8028
[ 1212.920246] Read of size 1 by task iw/3127
[...]
[ 1212.934946] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
[...]
[ 1212.950665] Call trace:
[ 1212.953148] [<ffffffc00020a69c>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x190
[ 1212.958572] [<ffffffc00020a96c>] show_stack+0x20/0x28
[ 1212.963648] [<ffffffc0005ce18c>] dump_stack+0xa4/0xcc
[ 1212.968723] [<ffffffc0003c4430>] kasan_report+0x378/0x500
[ 1212.974140] [<ffffffc0003c3358>] __asan_load1+0x44/0x4c
[ 1212.979462] [<ffffffbffc2e8360>] mwifiex_cfg80211_get_antenna+0x54/0xfc [mwifiex]
[ 1212.987131] [<ffffffbffc084fc4>] nl80211_send_wiphy+0x75c/0x2de0 [cfg80211]
[ 1212.994246] [<ffffffbffc094f60>] nl80211_dump_wiphy+0x32c/0x438 [cfg80211]
[ 1213.001149] [<ffffffc000ab6404>] genl_lock_dumpit+0x48/0x64
[ 1213.006746] [<ffffffc000ab3474>] netlink_dump+0x178/0x398
[ 1213.012171] [<ffffffc000ab3d18>] __netlink_dump_start+0x1bc/0x260
[...]

This all goes away if we just tear down the wiphy on the way down, and
set it back up if/when we bring the device back up.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
parent 7dc4a6b5
......@@ -1405,6 +1405,10 @@ static void mwifiex_uninit_sw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
rtnl_unlock();
}
vfree(adapter->chan_stats);
wiphy_unregister(adapter->wiphy);
wiphy_free(adapter->wiphy);
adapter->wiphy = NULL;
}
/*
......@@ -1686,9 +1690,6 @@ int mwifiex_remove_card(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
mwifiex_uninit_sw(adapter);
wiphy_unregister(adapter->wiphy);
wiphy_free(adapter->wiphy);
if (adapter->irq_wakeup >= 0)
device_init_wakeup(adapter->dev, false);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment