Commit 64ba4b15 authored by Tadeusz Struk's avatar Tadeusz Struk Committed by Namjae Jeon

exfat: check if cluster num is valid

Syzbot reported slab-out-of-bounds read in exfat_clear_bitmap.
This was triggered by reproducer calling truncute with size 0,
which causes the following trace:

BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
Read of size 8 at addr ffff888115aa9508 by task syz-executor251/365

Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e2/0x24b lib/dump_stack.c:118
 print_address_description+0x81/0x3c0 mm/kasan/report.c:233
 __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:419 [inline]
 kasan_report+0x1a4/0x1f0 mm/kasan/report.c:436
 __asan_report_load8_noabort+0x14/0x20 mm/kasan/report_generic.c:309
 exfat_clear_bitmap+0x147/0x490 fs/exfat/balloc.c:174
 exfat_free_cluster+0x25a/0x4a0 fs/exfat/fatent.c:181
 __exfat_truncate+0x99e/0xe00 fs/exfat/file.c:217
 exfat_truncate+0x11b/0x4f0 fs/exfat/file.c:243
 exfat_setattr+0xa03/0xd40 fs/exfat/file.c:339
 notify_change+0xb76/0xe10 fs/attr.c:336
 do_truncate+0x1ea/0x2d0 fs/open.c:65

Move the is_valid_cluster() helper from fatent.c to a common
header to make it reusable in other *.c files. And add is_valid_cluster()
to validate if cluster number is within valid range in exfat_clear_bitmap()
and exfat_set_bitmap().

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=50381fc73821ecae743b8cf24b4c9a04776f767c
Reported-by: syzbot+a4087e40b9c13aad7892@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1e49a94c ("exfat: add bitmap operations")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+
Signed-off-by: default avatarTadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarSungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarNamjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
parent 1b613838
......@@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ int exfat_set_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync)
struct super_block *sb = inode->i_sb;
struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
WARN_ON(clu < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER);
if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, clu))
return -EINVAL;
ent_idx = CLUSTER_TO_BITMAP_ENT(clu);
i = BITMAP_OFFSET_SECTOR_INDEX(sb, ent_idx);
b = BITMAP_OFFSET_BIT_IN_SECTOR(sb, ent_idx);
......@@ -166,7 +168,9 @@ void exfat_clear_bitmap(struct inode *inode, unsigned int clu, bool sync)
struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
struct exfat_mount_options *opts = &sbi->options;
WARN_ON(clu < EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER);
if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, clu))
return;
ent_idx = CLUSTER_TO_BITMAP_ENT(clu);
i = BITMAP_OFFSET_SECTOR_INDEX(sb, ent_idx);
b = BITMAP_OFFSET_BIT_IN_SECTOR(sb, ent_idx);
......
......@@ -382,6 +382,12 @@ static inline int exfat_sector_to_cluster(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi,
EXFAT_RESERVED_CLUSTERS;
}
static inline bool is_valid_cluster(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi,
unsigned int clus)
{
return clus >= EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER && clus < sbi->num_clusters;
}
/* super.c */
int exfat_set_volume_dirty(struct super_block *sb);
int exfat_clear_volume_dirty(struct super_block *sb);
......
......@@ -82,12 +82,6 @@ int exfat_ent_set(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int loc,
return 0;
}
static inline bool is_valid_cluster(struct exfat_sb_info *sbi,
unsigned int clus)
{
return clus >= EXFAT_FIRST_CLUSTER && clus < sbi->num_clusters;
}
int exfat_ent_get(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int loc,
unsigned int *content)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment