Commit 666f164f authored by Roland McGrath's avatar Roland McGrath

fix dangling zombie when new parent ignores children

This fixes an arcane bug that we think was a regression introduced
by commit b2b2cbc4.  When a parent
ignores SIGCHLD (or uses SA_NOCLDWAIT), its children would self-reap
but they don't if it's using ptrace on them.  When the parent thread
later exits and ceases to ptrace a child but leaves other live
threads in the parent's thread group, any zombie children are left
dangling.  The fix makes them self-reap then, as they would have
done earlier if ptrace had not been in use.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRoland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
parent 14dd0b81
...@@ -702,6 +702,23 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk) ...@@ -702,6 +702,23 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk)
mmput(mm); mmput(mm);
} }
/*
* Return nonzero if @parent's children should reap themselves.
*
* Called with write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock) held.
*/
static int ignoring_children(struct task_struct *parent)
{
int ret;
struct sighand_struct *psig = parent->sighand;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&psig->siglock, flags);
ret = (psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_handler == SIG_IGN ||
(psig->action[SIGCHLD-1].sa.sa_flags & SA_NOCLDWAIT));
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&psig->siglock, flags);
return ret;
}
/* /*
* Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on. * Detach all tasks we were using ptrace on.
* Any that need to be release_task'd are put on the @dead list. * Any that need to be release_task'd are put on the @dead list.
...@@ -711,6 +728,7 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk) ...@@ -711,6 +728,7 @@ static void exit_mm(struct task_struct * tsk)
static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead) static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead)
{ {
struct task_struct *p, *n; struct task_struct *p, *n;
int ign = -1;
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &parent->ptraced, ptrace_entry) { list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &parent->ptraced, ptrace_entry) {
__ptrace_unlink(p); __ptrace_unlink(p);
...@@ -726,10 +744,18 @@ static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead) ...@@ -726,10 +744,18 @@ static void ptrace_exit(struct task_struct *parent, struct list_head *dead)
* release_task() here because we already hold tasklist_lock. * release_task() here because we already hold tasklist_lock.
* *
* If it's our own child, there is no notification to do. * If it's our own child, there is no notification to do.
* But if our normal children self-reap, then this child
* was prevented by ptrace and we must reap it now.
*/ */
if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) { if (!task_detached(p) && thread_group_empty(p)) {
if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, parent)) if (!same_thread_group(p->real_parent, parent))
do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal); do_notify_parent(p, p->exit_signal);
else {
if (ign < 0)
ign = ignoring_children(parent);
if (ign)
p->exit_signal = -1;
}
} }
if (task_detached(p)) { if (task_detached(p)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment