Commit 68b99e94 authored by Srinivas Pandruvada's avatar Srinivas Pandruvada Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

thermal: intel_powerclamp: Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid crash

When CPU 0 is offline and intel_powerclamp is used to inject
idle, it generates kernel BUG:

BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: bash/15687
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
CPU: 4 PID: 15687 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc7+ #57
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x49/0x63
dump_stack+0x10/0x16
check_preemption_disabled+0xdd/0xe0
debug_smp_processor_id+0x17/0x20
powerclamp_set_cur_state+0x7f/0xf9 [intel_powerclamp]
...
...

Here CPU 0 is the control CPU by default and changed to the current CPU,
if CPU 0 offlined. This check has to be performed under cpus_read_lock(),
hence the above warning.

Use get_cpu() instead of smp_processor_id() to avoid this BUG.
Suggested-by: default avatarChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject edits ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent e9a7c526
......@@ -532,8 +532,10 @@ static int start_power_clamp(void)
/* prefer BSP */
control_cpu = 0;
if (!cpu_online(control_cpu))
control_cpu = smp_processor_id();
if (!cpu_online(control_cpu)) {
control_cpu = get_cpu();
put_cpu();
}
clamping = true;
schedule_delayed_work(&poll_pkg_cstate_work, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment