Commit 68c3a6ac authored by David Hildenbrand's avatar David Hildenbrand Committed by Linus Torvalds

drivers/base/memory.c: drop section_count

Patch series "mm: drop superfluous section checks when onlining/offlining".

Let's drop some superfluous section checks on the onlining/offlining path.

This patch (of 3):

Since commit c5e79ef5 ("mm/memory_hotplug.c: don't allow to
online/offline memory blocks with holes") we have a generic check in
offline_pages() that disallows offlining memory blocks with holes.

Memory blocks with missing sections are just another variant of these type
of blocks.  We can stop checking (and especially storing) present
sections.  A proper error message is now printed why offlining failed.

section_count was initially introduced in commit 07681215 ("Driver
core: Add section count to memory_block struct") in order to detect when
it is okay to remove a memory block.  It was used in commit 26bbe7ef
("drivers/base/memory.c: prohibit offlining of memory blocks with missing
sections") to disallow offlining memory blocks with missing sections.  As
we refactored creation/removal of memory devices and have a proper check
for holes in place, we can drop the section_count.

This also removes a leftover comment regarding the mem_sysfs_mutex, which
was removed in commit 848e19ad ("drivers/base/memory.c: drop the
mem_sysfs_mutex").
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200127110424.5757-2-david@redhat.comSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 9b12488a
......@@ -267,10 +267,6 @@ static int memory_subsys_offline(struct device *dev)
if (mem->state == MEM_OFFLINE)
return 0;
/* Can't offline block with non-present sections */
if (mem->section_count != sections_per_block)
return -EINVAL;
return memory_block_change_state(mem, MEM_OFFLINE, MEM_ONLINE);
}
......@@ -627,7 +623,7 @@ static int init_memory_block(struct memory_block **memory,
static int add_memory_block(unsigned long base_section_nr)
{
int ret, section_count = 0;
int section_count = 0;
struct memory_block *mem;
unsigned long nr;
......@@ -638,12 +634,8 @@ static int add_memory_block(unsigned long base_section_nr)
if (section_count == 0)
return 0;
ret = init_memory_block(&mem, base_memory_block_id(base_section_nr),
MEM_ONLINE);
if (ret)
return ret;
mem->section_count = section_count;
return 0;
return init_memory_block(&mem, base_memory_block_id(base_section_nr),
MEM_ONLINE);
}
static void unregister_memory(struct memory_block *memory)
......@@ -679,7 +671,6 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
ret = init_memory_block(&mem, block_id, MEM_OFFLINE);
if (ret)
break;
mem->section_count = sections_per_block;
}
if (ret) {
end_block_id = block_id;
......@@ -688,7 +679,6 @@ int create_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem))
continue;
mem->section_count = 0;
unregister_memory(mem);
}
}
......@@ -717,7 +707,6 @@ void remove_memory_block_devices(unsigned long start, unsigned long size)
mem = find_memory_block_by_id(block_id);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mem))
continue;
mem->section_count = 0;
unregister_memory_block_under_nodes(mem);
unregister_memory(mem);
}
......
......@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
struct memory_block {
unsigned long start_section_nr;
unsigned long state; /* serialized by the dev->lock */
int section_count; /* serialized by mem_sysfs_mutex */
int online_type; /* for passing data to online routine */
int phys_device; /* to which fru does this belong? */
struct device dev;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment