Commit 691d5264 authored by Martin Schwidefsky's avatar Martin Schwidefsky

s390/mm: fix incorrect ASCE after crst_table_downgrade

The switch_mm function does nothing in case the prev and next mm
are the same. It can happen that a crst_table_downgrade has changed
the top-level pgd in the meantime on a different CPU. Always store
the new ASCE to be picked up in entry.S.

[heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com]: Bug was introduced with git commit
53e857f3 ("s390/mm,tlb: race of lazy TLB flush vs. recreation
of TLB entries") and causes random crashes due to broken page tables
being used.
Reported-by: default avatarDominik Vogt <vogt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
parent a9ca8eb7
......@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
{
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
S390_lowcore.user_asce = next->context.asce_bits | __pa(next->pgd);
if (prev == next)
return;
if (MACHINE_HAS_TLB_LC)
......@@ -73,7 +74,6 @@ static inline void switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev, struct mm_struct *next,
atomic_dec(&prev->context.attach_count);
if (MACHINE_HAS_TLB_LC)
cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &prev->context.cpu_attach_mask);
S390_lowcore.user_asce = next->context.asce_bits | __pa(next->pgd);
}
#define finish_arch_post_lock_switch finish_arch_post_lock_switch
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment