Commit 6940faba authored by Keiichiro Tokunaga's avatar Keiichiro Tokunaga Committed by Len Brown

[ACPI] hotplug Processor consideration in acpi_bus_add()

Signed-off-by: default avatarKeiichiro Tokunaga <tokunaga.keiich@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
parent 8de7a63b
...@@ -1051,13 +1051,15 @@ acpi_bus_add ( ...@@ -1051,13 +1051,15 @@ acpi_bus_add (
/* /*
* Status * Status
* ------ * ------
* See if the device is present. We always assume that non-Device() * See if the device is present. We always assume that non-Device
* objects (e.g. thermal zones, power resources, processors, etc.) are * and non-Processor objects (e.g. thermal zones, power resources,
* present, functioning, etc. (at least when parent object is present). * etc.) are present, functioning, etc. (at least when parent object
* Note that _STA has a different meaning for some objects (e.g. * is present). Note that _STA has a different meaning for some
* power resources) so we need to be careful how we use it. * objects (e.g. power resources) so we need to be careful how we use
* it.
*/ */
switch (type) { switch (type) {
case ACPI_BUS_TYPE_PROCESSOR:
case ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE: case ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE:
result = acpi_bus_get_status(device); result = acpi_bus_get_status(device);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(result) || !device->status.present) { if (ACPI_FAILURE(result) || !device->status.present) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment