Commit 6a5a148a authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: fix bpf_probe_read_kernel prototype mismatch

bpf_probe_read_kernel() has a __weak definition in core.c and another
definition with an incompatible prototype in kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c,
when CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS is enabled.

Since the two are incompatible, there cannot be a shared declaration in
a header file, but the lack of a prototype causes a W=1 warning:

kernel/bpf/core.c:1638:12: error: no previous prototype for 'bpf_probe_read_kernel' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

On 32-bit architectures, the local prototype

u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)

passes arguments in other registers as the one in bpf_trace.c

BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_kernel, void *, dst, u32, size,
            const void *, unsafe_ptr)

which uses 64-bit arguments in pairs of registers.

As both versions of the function are fairly simple and only really
differ in one line, just move them into a header file as an inline
function that does not add any overhead for the bpf_trace.c callers
and actually avoids a function call for the other one.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac25cb0f-b804-1649-3afb-1dc6138c2716@iogearbox.net/Signed-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: default avatarYonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230801111449.185301-1-arnd@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 25ad1065
......@@ -2661,6 +2661,18 @@ static inline void bpf_dynptr_set_rdonly(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */
static __always_inline int
bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
{
int ret = -EFAULT;
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS))
ret = copy_from_kernel_nofault(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
memset(dst, 0, size);
return ret;
}
void __bpf_free_used_btfs(struct bpf_prog_aux *aux,
struct btf_mod_pair *used_btfs, u32 len);
......
......@@ -1650,12 +1650,6 @@ bool bpf_opcode_in_insntable(u8 code)
}
#ifndef CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
{
memset(dst, 0, size);
return -EFAULT;
}
/**
* ___bpf_prog_run - run eBPF program on a given context
* @regs: is the array of MAX_BPF_EXT_REG eBPF pseudo-registers
......@@ -2066,8 +2060,8 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn->off); \
CONT; \
LDX_PROBE_MEM_##SIZEOP: \
bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, sizeof(SIZE), \
(const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \
bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(&DST, sizeof(SIZE), \
(const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \
DST = *((SIZE *)&DST); \
CONT;
......@@ -2082,7 +2076,7 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
DST = *(SIZE *)(unsigned long) (SRC + insn->off); \
CONT; \
LDX_PROBE_MEMSX_##SIZEOP: \
bpf_probe_read_kernel(&DST, sizeof(SIZE), \
bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(&DST, sizeof(SIZE), \
(const void *)(long) (SRC + insn->off)); \
DST = *((SIZE *)&DST); \
CONT;
......
......@@ -223,17 +223,6 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_read_user_str_proto = {
.arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
static __always_inline int
bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr)
{
int ret;
ret = copy_from_kernel_nofault(dst, unsafe_ptr, size);
if (unlikely(ret < 0))
memset(dst, 0, size);
return ret;
}
BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_read_kernel, void *, dst, u32, size,
const void *, unsafe_ptr)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment