Commit 6fee1302 authored by Michael Ellerman's avatar Michael Ellerman

powerpc/64: Don't call trace_hardirqs_on() in prep_irq_for_idle()

Since commit a01353cf ("cpuidle: Fix ct_idle_*() usage"), the
cpuidle entry code calls trace_hardirqs_on() (actually
trace_hardirqs_on_prepare()) in ct_cpuidle_enter() before calling into
the cpuidle driver.
Suggested-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://msgid.link/20230406144535.3786008-2-mpe@ellerman.id.au
parent 7640854d
......@@ -348,9 +348,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_local_irq_restore);
* already the case when ppc_md.power_save is called). The function
* will return whether to enter power save or just return.
*
* In the former case, it will have notified lockdep of interrupts
* being re-enabled and generally sanitized the lazy irq state,
* and in the latter case it will leave with interrupts hard
* In the former case, it will have generally sanitized the lazy irq
* state, and in the latter case it will leave with interrupts hard
* disabled and marked as such, so the local_irq_enable() call
* in arch_cpu_idle() will properly re-enable everything.
*/
......@@ -370,9 +369,6 @@ __cpuidle bool prep_irq_for_idle(void)
if (lazy_irq_pending())
return false;
/* Tell lockdep we are about to re-enable */
trace_hardirqs_on();
/*
* Mark interrupts as soft-enabled and clear the
* PACA_IRQ_HARD_DIS from the pending mask since we
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment