Commit 7317d7b8 authored by Nick Piggin's avatar Nick Piggin Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: improve preempt debugging

This patch helped me out with a problem I recently had....

Basically, when the kernel lock is held, then preempt_count underflow does not
get detected until it is released which may be a long time (and arbitrarily,
eg at different points it may be rescheduled). If the bkl is released at
schedule, the resulting output is actually fairly cryptic...

With any other lock that elevates preempt_count, it is illegal to schedule
under it (which would get found pretty quickly). bkl allows scheduling with
preempt_count elevated, which makes underflows hard to debug.
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 6918bc5c
......@@ -4305,7 +4305,7 @@ void __kprobes sub_preempt_count(int val)
/*
* Underflow?
*/
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count()))
if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(val > preempt_count() - (!!kernel_locked())))
return;
/*
* Is the spinlock portion underflowing?
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment