Commit 7322dd75 authored by Arnd Bergmann's avatar Arnd Bergmann Committed by Linus Torvalds

byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug

This is another attempt to avoid a regression in wwn_to_u64() after that
started using get_unaligned_be64(), which in turn ran into a bug on
gcc-4.9 through 6.1.

The regression got introduced due to the combination of two separate
workarounds (commits e3bde956: "include/linux/unaligned: force
inlining of byteswap operations" and ef3fb242: "scsi: fc: use
get/put_unaligned64 for wwn access") that each try to sidestep distinct
problems with gcc behavior (code growth and increased stack usage).

Unfortunately after both have been applied, a more serious gcc bug has
been uncovered, leading to incorrect object code that discards part of a
function and causes undefined behavior.

As part of this problem is how __builtin_constant_p gets evaluated on an
argument passed by reference into an inline function, this avoids the
use of __builtin_constant_p() for all architectures that set
CONFIG_ARCH_USE_BUILTIN_BSWAP.  Most architectures do not set
ARCH_SUPPORTS_OPTIMIZED_INLINING, which means they probably do not
suffer from the problem in the qla2xxx driver, but they might still run
into it elsewhere.

Both of the original workarounds were only merged in the 4.6 kernel, and
the bug that is fixed by this patch should only appear if both are
there, so we probably don't need to backport the fix.  On the other
hand, it works by simplifying the code path and should not have any
negative effects.

[arnd@arndb.de: fix older gcc warnings]
  (http://lkml.kernel.org/r/12243652.bxSxEgjgfk@wuerfel)
Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/headers/2016/4/12/1103
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66122
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70232
Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646
Fixes: e3bde956 ("include/linux/unaligned: force inlining of byteswap operations")
Fixes: ef3fb242 ("scsi: fc: use get/put_unaligned64 for wwn access")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1780465.XdtPJpi8Tt@wuerfelSigned-off-by: default avatarArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> # on gcc-5.3
Tested-by: default avatarQuinn Tran <quinn.tran@qlogic.com>
Cc: Martin Jambor <mjambor@suse.cz>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@qlogic.com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 7c31190b
...@@ -45,9 +45,7 @@ ...@@ -45,9 +45,7 @@
static inline __attribute_const__ __u16 __fswab16(__u16 val) static inline __attribute_const__ __u16 __fswab16(__u16 val)
{ {
#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__ #if defined (__arch_swab16)
return __builtin_bswap16(val);
#elif defined (__arch_swab16)
return __arch_swab16(val); return __arch_swab16(val);
#else #else
return ___constant_swab16(val); return ___constant_swab16(val);
...@@ -56,9 +54,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u16 __fswab16(__u16 val) ...@@ -56,9 +54,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u16 __fswab16(__u16 val)
static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswab32(__u32 val) static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswab32(__u32 val)
{ {
#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP32__ #if defined(__arch_swab32)
return __builtin_bswap32(val);
#elif defined(__arch_swab32)
return __arch_swab32(val); return __arch_swab32(val);
#else #else
return ___constant_swab32(val); return ___constant_swab32(val);
...@@ -67,9 +63,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswab32(__u32 val) ...@@ -67,9 +63,7 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswab32(__u32 val)
static inline __attribute_const__ __u64 __fswab64(__u64 val) static inline __attribute_const__ __u64 __fswab64(__u64 val)
{ {
#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__ #if defined (__arch_swab64)
return __builtin_bswap64(val);
#elif defined (__arch_swab64)
return __arch_swab64(val); return __arch_swab64(val);
#elif defined(__SWAB_64_THRU_32__) #elif defined(__SWAB_64_THRU_32__)
__u32 h = val >> 32; __u32 h = val >> 32;
...@@ -102,28 +96,40 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswahb32(__u32 val) ...@@ -102,28 +96,40 @@ static inline __attribute_const__ __u32 __fswahb32(__u32 val)
* __swab16 - return a byteswapped 16-bit value * __swab16 - return a byteswapped 16-bit value
* @x: value to byteswap * @x: value to byteswap
*/ */
#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP16__
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
#else
#define __swab16(x) \ #define __swab16(x) \
(__builtin_constant_p((__u16)(x)) ? \ (__builtin_constant_p((__u16)(x)) ? \
___constant_swab16(x) : \ ___constant_swab16(x) : \
__fswab16(x)) __fswab16(x))
#endif
/** /**
* __swab32 - return a byteswapped 32-bit value * __swab32 - return a byteswapped 32-bit value
* @x: value to byteswap * @x: value to byteswap
*/ */
#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP32__
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
#else
#define __swab32(x) \ #define __swab32(x) \
(__builtin_constant_p((__u32)(x)) ? \ (__builtin_constant_p((__u32)(x)) ? \
___constant_swab32(x) : \ ___constant_swab32(x) : \
__fswab32(x)) __fswab32(x))
#endif
/** /**
* __swab64 - return a byteswapped 64-bit value * __swab64 - return a byteswapped 64-bit value
* @x: value to byteswap * @x: value to byteswap
*/ */
#ifdef __HAVE_BUILTIN_BSWAP64__
#define __swab64(x) (__u64)__builtin_bswap64((__u64)(x))
#else
#define __swab64(x) \ #define __swab64(x) \
(__builtin_constant_p((__u64)(x)) ? \ (__builtin_constant_p((__u64)(x)) ? \
___constant_swab64(x) : \ ___constant_swab64(x) : \
__fswab64(x)) __fswab64(x))
#endif
/** /**
* __swahw32 - return a word-swapped 32-bit value * __swahw32 - return a word-swapped 32-bit value
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment