Commit 743cde74 authored by Al Viro's avatar Al Viro

bfs_add_entry(): get rid of pointless ->d_name.len checks

First of all, any dentry getting here would have passed bfs_lookup(),
so it it passed ENAMETOOLONG check there, there's no need to
repeat it.  And we are not going to get dentries with zero name length -
that check ultimately comes from ext2 and it's as pointless here as it
used to be there.
Acked-by: default avatarTigran Aivazian <aivazian.tigran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
parent 96931dfe
......@@ -275,11 +275,6 @@ static int bfs_add_entry(struct inode *dir, const struct qstr *child, int ino)
dprintf("name=%s, namelen=%d\n", name, namelen);
if (!namelen)
return -ENOENT;
if (namelen > BFS_NAMELEN)
return -ENAMETOOLONG;
sblock = BFS_I(dir)->i_sblock;
eblock = BFS_I(dir)->i_eblock;
for (block = sblock; block <= eblock; block++) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment