Commit 75b8c133 authored by Herbert Xu's avatar Herbert Xu Committed by David S. Miller

[IPSEC]: Fix potential dst leak in xfrm_lookup

If we get an error during the actual policy lookup we don't free the
original dst while the caller expects us to always free the original
dst in case of error.

This patch fixes that.
Signed-off-by: default avatarHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 3f03e387
......@@ -1318,8 +1318,9 @@ int __xfrm_lookup(struct dst_entry **dst_p, struct flowi *fl,
if (sk && sk->sk_policy[XFRM_POLICY_OUT]) {
policy = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl);
err = PTR_ERR(policy);
if (IS_ERR(policy))
return PTR_ERR(policy);
goto dropdst;
}
if (!policy) {
......@@ -1330,8 +1331,9 @@ int __xfrm_lookup(struct dst_entry **dst_p, struct flowi *fl,
policy = flow_cache_lookup(fl, dst_orig->ops->family,
dir, xfrm_policy_lookup);
err = PTR_ERR(policy);
if (IS_ERR(policy))
return PTR_ERR(policy);
goto dropdst;
}
if (!policy)
......@@ -1501,8 +1503,9 @@ int __xfrm_lookup(struct dst_entry **dst_p, struct flowi *fl,
return 0;
error:
dst_release(dst_orig);
xfrm_pols_put(pols, npols);
dropdst:
dst_release(dst_orig);
*dst_p = NULL;
return err;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment