Commit 7691b85a authored by David Hildenbrand's avatar David Hildenbrand Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

KVM: s390: enable SIMD only when no VCPUs were created

commit 5967c17b upstream.

We should never allow to enable/disable any facilities for the guest
when other VCPUs were already created.

kvm_arch_vcpu_(load|put) relies on SIMD not changing during runtime.
If somebody would create and run VCPUs and then decides to enable
SIMD, undefined behaviour could be possible (e.g. vector save area
not being set up).
Acked-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Hildenbrand <dahi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent e8d09715
......@@ -289,12 +289,16 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_enable_cap *cap)
r = 0;
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_VECTOR_REGISTERS:
if (MACHINE_HAS_VX) {
mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
r = -EBUSY;
} else if (MACHINE_HAS_VX) {
set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac->mask, 129);
set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac->list, 129);
r = 0;
} else
r = -EINVAL;
mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
break;
case KVM_CAP_S390_USER_STSI:
kvm->arch.user_stsi = 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment