Commit 770847ba authored by Bjorn Helgaas's avatar Bjorn Helgaas Committed by Ralf Baechle

MIPS: Remove "weak" from get_c0_fdc_int() declaration

Weak header file declarations are error-prone because they make every
definition weak, and the linker chooses one based on link order (see
10629d71 ("PCI: Remove __weak annotation from pcibios_get_phb_of_node
decl")).

The most elegant solution is to have a weak default implementation and
allow a strong function to override it.  Then we don't have to test
whether a definition is present, and if there are ever multiple strong
definitions, we get a link error instead of calling a random definition.

Add a weak get_c0_fdc_int() definition with the default code and remove the
weak annotation from the declaration.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJames Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
Cc: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/10687/Signed-off-by: default avatarRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
parent ec0b9d35
......@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ extern int cp0_compare_irq_shift;
extern int cp0_perfcount_irq;
extern int cp0_fdc_irq;
extern int __weak get_c0_fdc_int(void);
extern int get_c0_fdc_int(void);
void arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace(bool);
#define arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace
......
......@@ -879,6 +879,11 @@ static const struct tty_operations mips_ejtag_fdc_tty_ops = {
.chars_in_buffer = mips_ejtag_fdc_tty_chars_in_buffer,
};
int __weak get_c0_fdc_int(void)
{
return -1;
}
static int mips_ejtag_fdc_tty_probe(struct mips_cdmm_device *dev)
{
int ret, nport;
......@@ -967,9 +972,7 @@ static int mips_ejtag_fdc_tty_probe(struct mips_cdmm_device *dev)
wake_up_process(priv->thread);
/* Look for an FDC IRQ */
priv->irq = -1;
if (get_c0_fdc_int)
priv->irq = get_c0_fdc_int();
priv->irq = get_c0_fdc_int();
/* Try requesting the IRQ */
if (priv->irq >= 0) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment