Commit 77c84dd1 authored by Douglas RAILLARD's avatar Douglas RAILLARD Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

sched/cpufreq: Align trace event behavior of fast switching

Fast switching path only emits an event for the CPU of interest, whereas the
regular path emits an event for all the CPUs that had their frequency changed,
i.e. all the CPUs sharing the same policy.

With the current behavior, looking at cpu_frequency event for a given CPU that
is using the fast switching path will not give the correct frequency signal.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDouglas RAILLARD <douglas.raillard@arm.com>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent e9a7cc1d
...@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time, ...@@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
unsigned int next_freq) unsigned int next_freq)
{ {
struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy; struct cpufreq_policy *policy = sg_policy->policy;
int cpu;
if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq)) if (!sugov_update_next_freq(sg_policy, time, next_freq))
return; return;
...@@ -126,7 +127,11 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time, ...@@ -126,7 +127,11 @@ static void sugov_fast_switch(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
return; return;
policy->cur = next_freq; policy->cur = next_freq;
trace_cpu_frequency(next_freq, smp_processor_id());
if (trace_cpu_frequency_enabled()) {
for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus)
trace_cpu_frequency(next_freq, cpu);
}
} }
static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time, static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy, u64 time,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment