Commit 7829ee78 authored by Petr Oros's avatar Petr Oros Committed by Jakub Kicinski

ice: use proper macro for testing bit

Do not use _test_bit() macro for testing bit. The proper macro for this
is one without underline.

_test_bit() is what test_bit() was prior to const-optimization. It
directly calls arch_test_bit(), i.e. the arch-specific implementation
(or the generic one). It's strictly _internal_ and shouldn't be used
anywhere outside the actual test_bit() macro.

test_bit() is a wrapper which checks whether the bitmap and the bit
number are compile-time constants and if so, it calls the optimized
function which evaluates this call to a compile-time constant as well.
If either of them is not a compile-time constant, it just calls _test_bit().
test_bit() is the actual function to use anywhere in the kernel.

IOW, calling _test_bit() avoids potential compile-time optimizations.

The sensors is not a compile-time constant, thus most probably there
are no object code changes before and after the patch.
But anyway, we shouldn't call internal wrappers instead of
the actual API.

Fixes: 4da71a77 ("ice: read internal temperature sensor")
Acked-by: default avatarIvan Vecera <ivecera@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPetr Oros <poros@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Pucha Himasekhar Reddy <himasekharx.reddy.pucha@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel)
Signed-off-by: default avatarTony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240702171459.2606611-5-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent be2a9d12
......@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static bool ice_is_internal_reading_supported(struct ice_pf *pf)
unsigned long sensors = pf->hw.dev_caps.supported_sensors;
return _test_bit(ICE_SENSOR_SUPPORT_E810_INT_TEMP_BIT, &sensors);
return test_bit(ICE_SENSOR_SUPPORT_E810_INT_TEMP_BIT, &sensors);
};
void ice_hwmon_init(struct ice_pf *pf)
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment