Commit 78417682 authored by Alexandre Belloni's avatar Alexandre Belloni

rtc: test: remove obsolete .set_mmss

There is no point in testing .set_mmss versus .set_mmss64 as there are both
taking the exact same argument (truncated for set_mmss though).

Also, this allows to constify struct rtc_ops.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
parent b64c984a
......@@ -13,10 +13,6 @@
#include <linux/rtc.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
static int test_mmss64;
module_param(test_mmss64, int, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(test_mmss64, "Test struct rtc_class_ops.set_mmss64().");
static struct platform_device *test0 = NULL, *test1 = NULL;
static int test_rtc_read_alarm(struct device *dev,
......@@ -44,12 +40,6 @@ static int test_rtc_set_mmss64(struct device *dev, time64_t secs)
return 0;
}
static int test_rtc_set_mmss(struct device *dev, unsigned long secs)
{
dev_info(dev, "%s, secs = %lu\n", __func__, secs);
return 0;
}
static int test_rtc_proc(struct device *dev, struct seq_file *seq)
{
struct platform_device *plat_dev = to_platform_device(dev);
......@@ -65,12 +55,12 @@ static int test_rtc_alarm_irq_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enable)
return 0;
}
static struct rtc_class_ops test_rtc_ops = {
static const struct rtc_class_ops test_rtc_ops = {
.proc = test_rtc_proc,
.read_time = test_rtc_read_time,
.read_alarm = test_rtc_read_alarm,
.set_alarm = test_rtc_set_alarm,
.set_mmss = test_rtc_set_mmss,
.set_mmss64 = test_rtc_set_mmss64,
.alarm_irq_enable = test_rtc_alarm_irq_enable,
};
......@@ -110,11 +100,6 @@ static int test_probe(struct platform_device *plat_dev)
int err;
struct rtc_device *rtc;
if (test_mmss64) {
test_rtc_ops.set_mmss64 = test_rtc_set_mmss64;
test_rtc_ops.set_mmss = NULL;
}
rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&plat_dev->dev, "test",
&test_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
if (IS_ERR(rtc)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment