Commit 7855a35a authored by Byungchul Park's avatar Byungchul Park Committed by Ingo Molnar

sched: Ensure a task has a non-normalized vruntime when returning back to CFS

Current code ensures that a task has a normalized vruntime when switching away
from the fair class, but it does not ensure the task has a non-normalized
vruntime when switching back to the fair class.

This is an example breaking this consistency:

  1. a task is in fair class and !queued
  2. changes its class to RT class (still !queued)
  3. changes its class to fair class again (still !queued)
Signed-off-by: default avatarByungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1439197375-27927-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.comSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
parent e237882b
......@@ -7930,16 +7930,31 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
*/
static void switched_to_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
/*
* Since the real-depth could have been changed (only FAIR
* class maintain depth value), reset depth properly.
*/
se->depth = se->parent ? se->parent->depth + 1 : 0;
#endif
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p))
if (!task_on_rq_queued(p)) {
/*
* Ensure the task has a non-normalized vruntime when it is switched
* back to the fair class with !queued, so that enqueue_entity() at
* wake-up time will do the right thing.
*
* If it's queued, then the enqueue_entity(.flags=0) makes the task
* has non-normalized vruntime, if it's !queued, then it still has
* normalized vruntime.
*/
if (p->state != TASK_RUNNING)
se->vruntime += cfs_rq_of(se)->min_vruntime;
return;
}
/*
* We were most likely switched from sched_rt, so
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment