btrfs: scrub: use larger block size for data extent scrub
[PROBLEM] The existing scrub code for data extents always limit the block size to sectorsize. This causes quite some extra scrub_block being allocated: (there is a data extent at logical bytenr 298844160, length 64KiB) alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 mirror=1 alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 mirror=1 ... scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298848256 physical=298848256 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298852352 physical=298852352 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298856448 physical=298856448 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298860544 physical=298860544 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298864640 physical=298864640 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298868736 physical=298868736 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298872832 physical=298872832 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298876928 physical=298876928 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298881024 physical=298881024 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298885120 physical=298885120 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298889216 physical=298889216 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298893312 physical=298893312 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298897408 physical=298897408 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298901504 physical=298901504 len=4096 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298905600 physical=298905600 len=4096 mirror=1 This behavior will waste a lot of memory, especially after we have moved quite some members from scrub_sector to scrub_block. [FIX] To reduce the allocation of scrub_block, and to reduce memory usage, use BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN instead of sectorsize as the block size to scrub data extents. This results only one scrub_block to be allocated for above data extent: alloc_scrub_block: new block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 mirror=1 scrub_block_put: free block: logical=298844160 physical=298844160 len=65536 mirror=1 This would greatly reduce the memory usage (even it's just transient) for larger data extents scrub. For above example, the memory usage would be: Old: num_sectors * (sizeof(scrub_block) + sizeof(scrub_sector)) 16 * (408 + 96) = 8065 New: sizeof(scrub_block) + num_sectors * sizeof(scrub_sector) 408 + 16 * 96 = 1944 A good reduction of 75.9%. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment