Commit 7fa5230b authored by Johannes Thumshirn's avatar Johannes Thumshirn Committed by David Sterba

btrfs: update stripe_extent delete loop assumptions

btrfs_delete_raid_extent() was written under the assumption, that it's
call-chain always passes a start, length tuple that matches a single
extent. But btrfs_delete_raid_extent() is called by
do_free_extent_accounting() which in turn is called by
__btrfs_free_extent().

But this call-chain passes in a start address and a length that can
possibly match multiple on-disk extents.

To make this possible, we have to adjust the start and length of each
btree node lookup, to not delete beyond the requested range.
Reviewed-by: default avatarQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 8c4cba2a
......@@ -66,6 +66,11 @@ int btrfs_delete_raid_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, u64 start, u64 le
if (ret)
break;
start += key.offset;
length -= key.offset;
if (length == 0)
break;
btrfs_release_path(path);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment