Commit 7fb98ea7 authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

workqueue: replace get_pwq() with explicit per_cpu_ptr() accesses and first_pwq()

get_pwq() takes @cpu, which can also be WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, and @wq and
returns the matching pwq (pool_workqueue).  We want to move away from
using @cpu for identifying pools and pwqs for unbound pools with
custom attributes and there is only one user - workqueue_congested() -
which makes use of the WQ_UNBOUND conditional in get_pwq().  All other
users already know whether they're dealing with a per-cpu or unbound
workqueue.

Replace get_pwq() with explicit per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu) for
per-cpu workqueues and first_pwq() for unbound ones, and open-code
WQ_UNBOUND conditional in workqueue_congested().

Note that this makes workqueue_congested() behave sligntly differently
when @cpu other than WORK_CPU_UNBOUND is specified.  It ignores @cpu
for unbound workqueues and always uses the first pwq instead of
oopsing.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
parent 420c0ddb
......@@ -463,16 +463,9 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_std_worker_pool(int cpu, bool highpri)
return &pools[highpri];
}
static struct pool_workqueue *get_pwq(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
static struct pool_workqueue *first_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)) {
if (likely(cpu < nr_cpu_ids))
return per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
} else if (likely(cpu == WORK_CPU_UNBOUND)) {
return list_first_entry(&wq->pwqs, struct pool_workqueue,
pwqs_node);
}
return NULL;
return list_first_entry(&wq->pwqs, struct pool_workqueue, pwqs_node);
}
static unsigned int work_color_to_flags(int color)
......@@ -1191,7 +1184,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
* work needs to be queued on that cpu to guarantee
* non-reentrancy.
*/
pwq = get_pwq(cpu, wq);
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
last_pool = get_work_pool(work);
if (last_pool && last_pool != pwq->pool) {
......@@ -1202,7 +1195,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
worker = find_worker_executing_work(last_pool, work);
if (worker && worker->current_pwq->wq == wq) {
pwq = get_pwq(last_pool->cpu, wq);
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, last_pool->cpu);
} else {
/* meh... not running there, queue here */
spin_unlock(&last_pool->lock);
......@@ -1212,7 +1205,7 @@ static void __queue_work(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq,
spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock);
}
} else {
pwq = get_pwq(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, wq);
pwq = first_pwq(wq);
spin_lock(&pwq->pool->lock);
}
......@@ -1650,7 +1643,7 @@ static void rebind_workers(struct worker_pool *pool)
else
wq = system_wq;
insert_work(get_pwq(pool->cpu, wq), rebind_work,
insert_work(per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, pool->cpu), rebind_work,
worker->scheduled.next,
work_color_to_flags(WORK_NO_COLOR));
}
......@@ -3088,7 +3081,8 @@ static int alloc_and_link_pwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
return -ENOMEM;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_pwq(cpu, wq);
struct pool_workqueue *pwq =
per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
pwq->pool = get_std_worker_pool(cpu, highpri);
list_add_tail(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs);
......@@ -3343,7 +3337,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(workqueue_set_max_active);
*/
bool workqueue_congested(int cpu, struct workqueue_struct *wq)
{
struct pool_workqueue *pwq = get_pwq(cpu, wq);
struct pool_workqueue *pwq;
if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
pwq = per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_pwqs, cpu);
else
pwq = first_pwq(wq);
return !list_empty(&pwq->delayed_works);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment