filemap: Drop the refcount while waiting for page lock

Commit bd8a1f36 ("mm/filemap: support readpage splitting a page")
changed the read_iter path to drop the refcount while waiting for the
page lock.  However, it missed the same pattern in read_mapping_page()
and friends.  Use the same pattern in do_read_cache_folio() that is
used in filemap_update_page().
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
parent 539a3322
......@@ -3460,45 +3460,12 @@ static struct folio *do_read_cache_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
goto out;
/*
* Page is not up to date and may be locked due to one of the following
* case a: Page is being filled and the page lock is held
* case b: Read/write error clearing the page uptodate status
* case c: Truncation in progress (page locked)
* case d: Reclaim in progress
*
* Case a, the page will be up to date when the page is unlocked.
* There is no need to serialise on the page lock here as the page
* is pinned so the lock gives no additional protection. Even if the
* page is truncated, the data is still valid if PageUptodate as
* it's a race vs truncate race.
* Case b, the page will not be up to date
* Case c, the page may be truncated but in itself, the data may still
* be valid after IO completes as it's a read vs truncate race. The
* operation must restart if the page is not uptodate on unlock but
* otherwise serialising on page lock to stabilise the mapping gives
* no additional guarantees to the caller as the page lock is
* released before return.
* Case d, similar to truncation. If reclaim holds the page lock, it
* will be a race with remove_mapping that determines if the mapping
* is valid on unlock but otherwise the data is valid and there is
* no need to serialise with page lock.
*
* As the page lock gives no additional guarantee, we optimistically
* wait on the page to be unlocked and check if it's up to date and
* use the page if it is. Otherwise, the page lock is required to
* distinguish between the different cases. The motivation is that we
* avoid spurious serialisations and wakeups when multiple processes
* wait on the same page for IO to complete.
*/
folio_wait_locked(folio);
if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
goto out;
/* Distinguish between all the cases under the safety of the lock */
folio_lock(folio);
if (!folio_trylock(folio)) {
folio_put_wait_locked(folio, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
goto repeat;
}
/* Case c or d, restart the operation */
/* Folio was truncated from mapping */
if (!folio->mapping) {
folio_unlock(folio);
folio_put(folio);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment