Commit 82d16b39 authored by Lauri Hintsala's avatar Lauri Hintsala Committed by Greg Kroah-Hartman

mmc: mxs-mmc: fix deadlock caused by recursion loop

commit fc108d24 upstream.

Release the lock before mmc_signal_sdio_irq is called by
mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq.

Backtrace:
[   65.470000] =============================================
[   65.470000] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[   65.470000] 3.5.0-rc5 #2 Not tainted
[   65.470000] ---------------------------------------------
[   65.470000] ksdioirqd/mmc0/73 is trying to acquire lock:
[   65.470000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] but task is already holding lock:
[   65.470000]  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] other info that might help us debug this:
[   65.470000]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]        CPU0
[   65.470000]        ----
[   65.470000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   65.470000]   lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock#2);
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] 1 lock held by ksdioirqd/mmc0/73:
[   65.470000]  #0:  (&(&host->lock)->rlock#2){-.-...}, at: [<bf054120>] mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]
[   65.470000]
[   65.470000] stack backtrace:
[   65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98)
[   65.470000] [<c005ccb8>] (__lock_acquire+0x14f8/0x1b98) from [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108)
[   65.470000] [<c005d3f8>] (lock_acquire+0xa0/0x108) from [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c)
[   65.470000] [<c02f671c>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x48/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274)
[   65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98)
[   65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
[   65.470000] BUG: spinlock lockup suspected on CPU#0, ksdioirqd/mmc0/73
[   65.470000]  lock: 0xc3358724, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: ksdioirqd/mmc0/73, .owner_cpu: 0
[   65.470000] [<c0014990>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf4) from [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144)
[   65.470000] [<c01b46b0>] (do_raw_spin_lock+0x100/0x144) from [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c)
[   65.470000] [<c02f6724>] (_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x5c) from [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf054120>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0x18/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc])
[   65.470000] [<bf0541d0>] (mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq+0xc8/0xdc [mxs_mmc]) from [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274)
[   65.470000] [<c0219b38>] (sdio_irq_thread+0x1bc/0x274) from [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98)
[   65.470000] [<c003c324>] (kthread+0x8c/0x98) from [<c00101ac>] (kernel_thread_exit+0x0/0x8)
Reported-by: default avatarAttila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLauri Hintsala <lauri.hintsala@bluegiga.com>
Acked-by: default avatarShawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2:
 - Adjust context
 - HW_SSP_STATUS is a simple rather than function-like macro]
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Qiang Huang <h.huangqiang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
parent faf10038
...@@ -639,10 +639,6 @@ static void mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable) ...@@ -639,10 +639,6 @@ static void mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
host->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + MXS_SET_ADDR); host->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + MXS_SET_ADDR);
writel(BM_SSP_CTRL1_SDIO_IRQ_EN, writel(BM_SSP_CTRL1_SDIO_IRQ_EN,
host->base + HW_SSP_CTRL1 + MXS_SET_ADDR); host->base + HW_SSP_CTRL1 + MXS_SET_ADDR);
if (readl(host->base + HW_SSP_STATUS) & BM_SSP_STATUS_SDIO_IRQ)
mmc_signal_sdio_irq(host->mmc);
} else { } else {
writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_SDIO_IRQ_CHECK, writel(BM_SSP_CTRL0_SDIO_IRQ_CHECK,
host->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + MXS_CLR_ADDR); host->base + HW_SSP_CTRL0 + MXS_CLR_ADDR);
...@@ -651,6 +647,10 @@ static void mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable) ...@@ -651,6 +647,10 @@ static void mxs_mmc_enable_sdio_irq(struct mmc_host *mmc, int enable)
} }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&host->lock, flags);
if (enable && readl(host->base + HW_SSP_STATUS) & BM_SSP_STATUS_SDIO_IRQ)
mmc_signal_sdio_irq(host->mmc);
} }
static const struct mmc_host_ops mxs_mmc_ops = { static const struct mmc_host_ops mxs_mmc_ops = {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment