Commit 83462a6c authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo Committed by Jens Axboe

blkcg: Drop unnecessary RCU read [un]locks from blkg_conf_prep/finish()

Now that all RCU flavors have been combined either holding a spin lock,
disabling irq or disabling preemption implies RCU read lock, so there's no
need to use rcu_read_[un]lock() explicitly while holding queue_lock. This
shouldn't cause any behavior changes.

v2: Description updated. Leave __acquires/release on queue_lock alone.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230413000649.115785-2-tj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent d8898ee5
......@@ -699,12 +699,12 @@ struct block_device *blkcg_conf_open_bdev(char **inputp)
*
* Parse per-blkg config update from @input and initialize @ctx with the
* result. @ctx->blkg points to the blkg to be updated and @ctx->body the
* part of @input following MAJ:MIN. This function returns with RCU read
* lock and queue lock held and must be paired with blkg_conf_finish().
* part of @input following MAJ:MIN. This function returns with queue lock
* held and must be paired with blkg_conf_finish().
*/
int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
char *input, struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
__acquires(rcu) __acquires(&bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock)
__acquires(&bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock)
{
struct block_device *bdev;
struct gendisk *disk;
......@@ -726,7 +726,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
if (ret)
goto fail;
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) {
......@@ -755,7 +754,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
/* Drop locks to do new blkg allocation with GFP_KERNEL. */
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
new_blkg = blkg_alloc(pos, disk, GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!new_blkg)) {
......@@ -769,7 +767,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
goto fail_exit_queue;
}
rcu_read_lock();
spin_lock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
if (!blkcg_policy_enabled(q, pol)) {
......@@ -805,7 +802,6 @@ int blkg_conf_prep(struct blkcg *blkcg, const struct blkcg_policy *pol,
radix_tree_preload_end();
fail_unlock:
spin_unlock_irq(&q->queue_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
fail_exit_queue:
blk_queue_exit(q);
fail:
......@@ -832,10 +828,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_conf_prep);
* with blkg_conf_prep().
*/
void blkg_conf_finish(struct blkg_conf_ctx *ctx)
__releases(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock) __releases(rcu)
__releases(&ctx->bdev->bd_queue->queue_lock)
{
spin_unlock_irq(&bdev_get_queue(ctx->bdev)->queue_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
blkdev_put_no_open(ctx->bdev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blkg_conf_finish);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment