Commit 83493d7e authored by Tejun Heo's avatar Tejun Heo

libata: use wider match for blacklisting Crucial M500

We're now blacklisting "Crucial_CT???M500SSD1" and
"Crucial_CT???M500SSD3".  Also, "Micron_M500*" is blacklisted which is
about the same devices as the crucial branded ones.  Let's merge the
two Crucial M500 entries and widen the match to
"Crucial_CT???M500SSD*" so that we don't have to fiddle with new
entries for similar devices.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Suggested-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
parent b28a613e
......@@ -4225,8 +4225,7 @@ static const struct ata_blacklist_entry ata_device_blacklist [] = {
/* devices that don't properly handle queued TRIM commands */
{ "Micron_M500*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM, },
{ "Crucial_CT???M500SSD1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM, },
{ "Crucial_CT???M500SSD3", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM, },
{ "Crucial_CT???M500SSD*", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NO_NCQ_TRIM, },
/*
* Some WD SATA-I drives spin up and down erratically when the link
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment