Commit 8418031d authored by Jiri Slaby's avatar Jiri Slaby Committed by Zefan Li

x86/vdso: Fix the build on GCC5

commit e8932869 upstream.

On gcc5 the kernel does not link:

  ld: .eh_frame_hdr table[4] FDE at 0000000000000648 overlaps table[5] FDE at 0000000000000670.

Because prior GCC versions always emitted NOPs on ALIGN directives, but
gcc5 started omitting them.

.LSTARTFDEDLSI1 says:

        /* HACK: The dwarf2 unwind routines will subtract 1 from the
           return address to get an address in the middle of the
           presumed call instruction.  Since we didn't get here via
           a call, we need to include the nop before the real start
           to make up for it.  */
        .long .LSTART_sigreturn-1-.     /* PC-relative start address */

But commit 69d0627a ("x86 vDSO: reorder vdso32 code") from 2.6.25
replaced .org __kernel_vsyscall+32,0x90 by ALIGN right before
__kernel_sigreturn.

Of course, ALIGN need not generate any NOP in there. Esp. gcc5 collapses
vclock_gettime.o and int80.o together with no generated NOPs as "ALIGN".

So fix this by adding to that point at least a single NOP and make the
function ALIGN possibly with more NOPs then.

Kudos for reporting and diagnosing should go to Richard.
Reported-by: default avatarRichard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Acked-by: default avatarAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1425543211-12542-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.czSigned-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarZefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
parent c1c04e78
......@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
.text
.globl __kernel_sigreturn
.type __kernel_sigreturn,@function
nop /* this guy is needed for .LSTARTFDEDLSI1 below (watch for HACK) */
ALIGN
__kernel_sigreturn:
.LSTART_sigreturn:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment